Household and dwelling contact as risk factors for leprosy in northern Malawi.

Data on household and dwelling contact with known leprosy cases were available on more than 80,000 initially disease-free individuals followed up during the 1980s in a rural district of northern Malawi. A total of 331 new cases of leprosy were diagnosed among them. Individuals recorded as living in household or dwelling contact with multibacillary patients at the start of follow-up were at approximately five- to eightfold increased risk of leprosy, respectively, compared with individuals not living in such households or dwellings. Individuals living in household or dwelling contact with paucibacillary cases were both at approximately twofold increased risk. The higher risk associated with multibacillary contact and the fact that dwelling contact entailed a greater risk than household contact if the association was with multibacillary, but not with paucibacillary, disease suggest that paucibacillary cases may not themselves be sources of transmission, but rather just markers that a household has had contact with some (outside) source of infection. When household contact was considered alone, the risks of disease were appreciably higher for younger than for older contacts and for male compared with female contacts. Despite the elevated risk of leprosy associated with household or dwelling contact, only 15% of all incidence cases arose among recognized household contacts. Given the dynamic nature of household membership and consequent misclassification of contact status, the true contribution to overall incidence of contact within household or dwelling settings is likely to be much higher than this, perhaps 30% or higher. Considering the predilection of males for infectious multibacillary forms of the disease, the transmission of Mycobacterium leprae at an early age, in particular to males, may be of particular importance for the persistence of leprosy in endemic communities. Although residential contact with a multibacillary case is the strongest known determinant of leprosy risk, the vast majority of such contacts never manifest disease, which indicates a crucial role for genetic and/or environmental factors in the transmission of M. leprae infection and/or the pathogenesis of clinical leprosy.

Polymerase chain reaction of nasal swabs from tuberculosis patients and their contacts.

Previous studies have found Mycobacterium leprae in nasal swabs from leprosy patients, their contacts, and persons living in endemic areas. It might be expected that M. tuberculosis would be present on nasal mucosa of pulmonary tuberculosis patients, but whether they can be detected in patients or contacts is unknown. We used the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique on nasal swabs from tuberculosis patients, contacts of tuberculosis patients, leprosy patients, and London controls to look for both M. tuberculosis and M. leprae. Swabs dipped in sputum specimens from smear-positive patients were used as positive controls. The PCRs were conducted in two independent laboratories. M. tuberculosis was detected in nasal swabs from 6/16 smear-positive tuberculosis patients and from 1/10 household contacts by one of the laboratories. All of the sputum swabs were positive for M. tuberculosis, and all of the London controls were negative. M. leprae were found in nasal swabs from 2/5 leprosy patients, but one laboratory also reported M. leprae in swabs from 4/21 tuberculosis patients and from one sputum specimen. The results show that M. tuberculosis can be found in the noses of some tuberculosis patients, and suggest that the bacilli also may be detected in some household contacts. The comparisons with M. leprae and between the two laboratories give further insights into the sensitivity and specificity of the technique.

Does bacille Calmette-Guérin scar size have implications for protection against tuberculosis or leprosy?

SETTING: Total population study in Karonga District, northern Malawi, in which the overall vaccine efficacy of bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) has been found to be -7% against tuberculosis and 54% against leprosy. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between BCG scar size and protection against tuberculosis and leprosy. DESIGN: Cohort study in which 85,134 individuals were screened for tuberculosis and 82,265 for leprosy between 1979 and 1984, and followed up between 1986 and 1989. RESULTS: Of the BCG scar positive individuals whose scars were measured, 31/3 2471 were later identified with tuberculosis and 81/31 879 with leprosy. In 19,114 individuals, of whom 17 developed tuberculosis, tuberculin induration was measured at first examination. Mean scar sizes increased with increasing tuberculin induration in all except the oldest individuals. Mean scar sizes were lowest in individuals aged < 10 years, highest in individuals aged 10-29 years and intermediate in older individuals. There was some evidence (P = 0.08) for an increase in tuberculosis risk with increasing scar size, which probably reflects the known correlation between scar size and tuberculin status at the time of vaccination. There was no clear association between BCG scar size and leprosy incidence. CONCLUSIONS: We find no evidence that increased BCG scar size is a correlate of vaccine-induced protective immunity against either tuberculosis or leprosy.